intro
this document helps you understand me (my quirks, values, etc.), and how to best engage with me in a work context.
disclaimers:
- i don't have perfect self-awareness, so this limits how much i can guide you.
- i am—and aim to always be—a work-in-progress, so the information here will always lag the present (but i'll try to keep it as fresh as i can).
communicating with me
- email / slack for communications that can tolerate a few hours of delay (to 1 day)—text for higher responsiveness.
- i use "do not disturb" mode aggressively on my phones and communication apps, so calling me usually doesn't get a faster response.
- i'm usually available from 9 am to 9 pm each day (weekend availability is more spotty).
meetings
- i accept meetings as a necessary evil in modern work culture, as long as they satisfy these criteria: 1) possess clear target or agenda, 2) the topic necessitates synchronous communication, i.e. multiple turns with high-bandwidth and low-latency (negative example: sharing/ingesting summarized state (e.g. project status)—can be accomplished via email, positive examples: debating to reach a mutual understanding (even if people disagree with each other), or freestyle brainstorming), 3) contents of the meeting are well-documented.
- meetings are NOT a good place to make decisions. if something contentious needs a decision, it's best to use a meeting to exchange perspectives, discuss trade-offs, and agree on a timeframe for reaching a decision.
- prefer meetings to be scheduled in advance, i chafe against spontaneous meetings.
how to convince me
- exhibit intellectual honesty by showing you've explored alternatives, understood the trade-offs, and arrived at an opinion with an honest accounting of the risks involved (e.g. one-way vs two-way doors), and/or limits of what you know.
- presenting data is great, but not always available (and sometimes a crutch), so can be substituted with a plan to quickly gather data to justify or reverse a decision.
- i prefer solitude to think through options, and resist making decisions in the "heat of the moment".
things i do that may annoy you
- to show engagement in conversations and presentations, i often smile and nod along to what a speaker is saying, but it doesn't mean i agree with what is being said.
- i often express my thoughts out loud, in real-time, which may appear as rambling or incoherent. so if my point isn't clear, ask me to clarify.
- i use debate as an indispensable tool to build a robust understanding of points and ideas expressed by others. i'm not an opinionated person but if you see me challenging an idea or presenting a different side, it doesn't mean i agree or i'm being negative.
- i push myself and others towards record-keeping (of plans, processes, decisions, meetings, spec's, etc.) through execellent documentation. the net effect of this rigor helps with organizational velocity by facilitating feedback, improving alignment, and shining a light on assumptions and limits of our knowledge.
things that annoy me
- complaining without construction, i.e. an intention to problem-solve.
- i get pig headed when people tell me what to do, or arrogantly assert they know best.
- communications with filler/fluff, i.e. using more words when fewer would do.
- uninvited disruptions to my individual focus time.
- waiting for late arrivals to a meeting. (at the same time, i'm not a punctual human being. it's hypocritical, but please respect my time and don't be late to our meeting. i will sincerely try to do the same.)
- areas or projects with unclear or multiple owners / decision-makers.
my strengths
- i tend to trust people by default to know what they are doing and follow-through. i do not like to intervene or micromanage—unless asked for help.
- i seek to deeply understand a problem and its context before taking next steps.
- i place a lot of value on having clear narratives and being able to to speak to the meaning behind work, which makes me a good story teller.
my growth areas
- i have no shortage of new ideas, which can lead me to chase short-term distractions, harming long-term focus.
- i'm the overly optimistic type who tends to overcommit to more than can be reasonably done.
- i'm not the most detail-oriented person.
some of my guiding heuristics
- velocity is more important than speed
- focus is a force multiplier
- be intentional
- if you want to go fast, go alone. if you want to go far, go together.
- every decision is an experiment
- action produces information
- fast iteration can make up for a lot of mistakes
- this too shall pass